Wheel sectors and neighbours
Physical adjacency and table-grid adjacency are different groupings.
What it describes
Neighbour groups follow the physical order of pockets around the wheel. Sectors such as Voisins, Tiers and Orphelins refer to established groups. Corners and other layout groups instead follow the printed number grid.
Formula & principle
Selection rule; no built-in stake progression
The demo fixes five adjacent pockets around zero: 3, 26, 0, 32, 15. Each receives $2, so the total is $10 every round. Neighbour selection does not itself define an increasing progression.
B(n) is one stake. On the left, the counter sums all losing stakes with a minus sign and freezes after round 25. On the right, all 25 results are watched without a stake. One $10 stake is then placed for round 26. Its payout follows the selected target: for an even-money bet, $20 returned means $10 stake plus $10 profit. Other targets use their own payout rules.
Same pattern. Different starting points.
A deliberately constructed series: 25 × No Neighbours, then a matching result at 26. The end is known in this demo only.
Two different snapshots: the left freezes accumulated losses after 25 stakes, before the break. The right skips all 25 rounds, places one $10 stake before round 26, and shows its winning payout, including the returned stake. Net profit is shown separately. This is a selected winning example with a predetermined break, not an equal-length profit comparison.
Without Winnary
Starts at round 1
Waiting for this track
With Winnary
Starts at round 26
Waiting for this track
Model: Five neighbours around zero: 3, 26, 0, 32, 15; $2 on each, $10 total each round. The left follows the strategy throughout the losing series. “With Winnary” shows only one initial $10 stake after 25 observed results; there is no earlier loss or stake progression in that column. It is not a measured product result. The Legendary label is illustrative, not a calculated rarity.
Fewer stakes mean less accumulated exposure in this selected sequence. A stake placed after round 25 has no better next-spin odds, and the pattern could continue beyond 26. This model assumes unlimited funds and no table limits. The break is observed after settlement; it cannot cancel a stake already placed. Winnary cannot enforce a loss limit at an external table. Every losing stake is added to the running loss. In the single-stake example, payout includes the returned stake; net profit subtracts that stake. Coverage payouts also account for losing parts of a split allocation. If the round-1 track continued through the same break at round 26, its net would be -$188; that final stake would be $10. The later start does not improve next-spin odds.
Demo ready. Both examples use the same predetermined results.
What the mathematics says
An analyser should preserve these distinctions. Consecutive printed numbers are not generally consecutive wheel pockets. Winnary’s European-wheel illustrations use the single-zero order and the corresponding red, black and green colours.
How to read the evidence
Grouping outcomes is useful for organising observations. It does not establish that a group has predictive power. A sector-based hypothesis would require a defined mechanism, a reliable sample, correction for selection and an independent validation set.
Wheel sectors and neighbours: without and with Winnary
This compares the information available, not measured winnings or losses.
| Without Winnary | With Winnary |
|---|---|
| Printed neighbours and physical wheel neighbours may be confused in a pattern claim. | Use the named group in the observation to identify what is being counted. |
What does not change. A group’s historical absence does not make that sector more likely on the next spin.
Roulette predictor claims: what evidence matters? ↗Where Winnary fits
Winnary is a roulette analyser that organises observations. Rarity labels and rankings are descriptive. They are not a prediction of the next spin, evidence of a profitable system or a recommendation to act.
Read about the analyser ↗